<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The L Word, week 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellejones.net/onapath/2004/02/the-l-word-week-4.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellejones.net/onapath/2004/02/the-l-word-week-4.php</link>
	<description>a Michelle Jones type situation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:42:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KarenZipdrive</title>
		<link>http://michellejones.net/onapath/2004/02/the-l-word-week-4.php/comment-page-1#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>KarenZipdrive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellejones.net/onapath/?p=7#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Loved the recap.
I think I may love you, too.
;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved the recap.<br />
I think I may love you, too. <img src='http://michellejones.net/onapath/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://michellejones.net/onapath/2004/02/the-l-word-week-4.php/comment-page-1#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellejones.net/onapath/?p=7#comment-27</guid>
		<description>But the character didn&#039;t call himself a transexual (or gay or any of the other terms you try to equate here). He called himself a male identified lesbian. That will never ever work for me. Never. Lesbian refers to a woman. I&#039;m ok with that. I don&#039;t think a man gets to decide he&#039;s a lesbian. Obviously you think that&#039;s an ok thing as is your right. I respectfully disagree.
This analogy is horribly wrong but I&#039;m going to use it anyway because I want to use the same context you do. Since you try to equat male identified lesbian with Black or Native American I&#039;ll just point out that should I decide to refer to myself as a Black identified white person I&#039;m sure my beloeved African-American friends would take serious issue with it, as they should.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the character didn&#8217;t call himself a transexual (or gay or any of the other terms you try to equate here). He called himself a male identified lesbian. That will never ever work for me. Never. Lesbian refers to a woman. I&#8217;m ok with that. I don&#8217;t think a man gets to decide he&#8217;s a lesbian. Obviously you think that&#8217;s an ok thing as is your right. I respectfully disagree.<br />
This analogy is horribly wrong but I&#8217;m going to use it anyway because I want to use the same context you do. Since you try to equat male identified lesbian with Black or Native American I&#8217;ll just point out that should I decide to refer to myself as a Black identified white person I&#8217;m sure my beloeved African-American friends would take serious issue with it, as they should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://michellejones.net/onapath/2004/02/the-l-word-week-4.php/comment-page-1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellejones.net/onapath/?p=7#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s try replacing &quot;lesbian identified man&quot; in these posts with other terms related to sexual identity and race and see if they sound familiar:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;[Alice] has a crush on a man who calls himself a &lt;strong&gt;transexual&lt;/strong&gt;. Excuse me? What the fuck are you talking about? If I heard correctly he also calls himself Lisa. Lisa the &lt;strong&gt;transexual&lt;/strong&gt;. Let&#039;s just repeat that to ourselves for a moment... &lt;strong&gt;Transexual&lt;/strong&gt;. Apparently I missed the update to the definition of woman from &quot;of or relating to females&quot; to including men. I swear when the character spoke the line about being a &lt;strong&gt;transexual&lt;/strong&gt; I really just want to hurl.
&lt;li&gt;What I&#039;m really pissed about though is that Lisa the &lt;strong&gt;lesbian&lt;/strong&gt; was played by Brianna Krakow. I love Brianna Krakow but not even my affection for her is making her character (and what I anticipate to be a continuing storyline) less nauseating for me.
&lt;li&gt;Brian Krakow used the term &lt;strong&gt;drag queen&lt;/strong&gt; and I wanted to jump through the screen and smack him.
&lt;li&gt;I am having a serious problem with the whole &lt;strong&gt;butch&lt;/strong&gt; thing. [snip] this Lisa chick bothers me. She really bothers me.
&lt;li&gt;[From February 23 post] The &lt;strong&gt;Black&lt;/strong&gt; Man was back this episode and made me want to hurl. He and Alice (the &lt;strong&gt;black-loving&lt;/strong&gt; character) look to be on track for at least a bit of dating which means I&#039;m going to have to watch this crap a lot. So not amusing.
&lt;li&gt;...the whole &lt;strong&gt;queer&lt;/strong&gt; thing was just stupid. if i ever, ever meet anyone identifying as such, i will have to run away just to avoid saying something mean. immediate eye-rolling, however, will be unavoidable.
&lt;li&gt;After watching this episode, I finally found the time to look on the internet for the definition of a &lt;strong&gt;gay man&lt;/strong&gt; - 1 word - HOW ?
&lt;li&gt;If &lt;strong&gt;Native American&lt;/strong&gt; is too stupid too say, then what is a more appropriate term?
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
Does this sexual orientation threaten the &quot;sanctity of lesbianism&quot;? Do we need a constitutional amendment to ban the existence of lesbian identified men?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Let there be tolerance on earth ... but let it begin with straight, white men? We&#039;d have quite an accomplishment on our hands if we could just have some tolerant lesbian women. I&#039;ll personally be taking all the advice I might have for homophobic straight men and giving it to myself. (e.g. &quot;Just because they&#039;re attracted to people of your sex doesn&#039;t mean you have to have sex with them.&quot;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I know he&#039;s a just fictional character, but so are Will and Grace and plenty of homophobes manage to get as nauseated by Jack and Will as you seem to be by Lisa.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
InJoy,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
G&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;Love is never wrong.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;All you need to know is Ms. Ellen is a lesbian and that means she only likes other lesbians.&quot; -- Chef, South Park
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s try replacing &#8220;lesbian identified man&#8221; in these posts with other terms related to sexual identity and race and see if they sound familiar:</p>
<ul>
<li>[Alice] has a crush on a man who calls himself a <strong>transexual</strong>. Excuse me? What the fuck are you talking about? If I heard correctly he also calls himself Lisa. Lisa the <strong>transexual</strong>. Let&#8217;s just repeat that to ourselves for a moment&#8230; <strong>Transexual</strong>. Apparently I missed the update to the definition of woman from &#8220;of or relating to females&#8221; to including men. I swear when the character spoke the line about being a <strong>transexual</strong> I really just want to hurl.
</li>
<li>What I&#8217;m really pissed about though is that Lisa the <strong>lesbian</strong> was played by Brianna Krakow. I love Brianna Krakow but not even my affection for her is making her character (and what I anticipate to be a continuing storyline) less nauseating for me.
</li>
<li>Brian Krakow used the term <strong>drag queen</strong> and I wanted to jump through the screen and smack him.
</li>
<li>I am having a serious problem with the whole <strong>butch</strong> thing. [snip] this Lisa chick bothers me. She really bothers me.
</li>
<li>[From February 23 post] The <strong>Black</strong> Man was back this episode and made me want to hurl. He and Alice (the <strong>black-loving</strong> character) look to be on track for at least a bit of dating which means I&#8217;m going to have to watch this crap a lot. So not amusing.
</li>
<li>&#8230;the whole <strong>queer</strong> thing was just stupid. if i ever, ever meet anyone identifying as such, i will have to run away just to avoid saying something mean. immediate eye-rolling, however, will be unavoidable.
</li>
<li>After watching this episode, I finally found the time to look on the internet for the definition of a <strong>gay man</strong> &#8211; 1 word &#8211; HOW ?
</li>
<li>If <strong>Native American</strong> is too stupid too say, then what is a more appropriate term?
</li>
</ul>
<p>Does this sexual orientation threaten the &#8220;sanctity of lesbianism&#8221;? Do we need a constitutional amendment to ban the existence of lesbian identified men?</p>
<p>Let there be tolerance on earth &#8230; but let it begin with straight, white men? We&#8217;d have quite an accomplishment on our hands if we could just have some tolerant lesbian women. I&#8217;ll personally be taking all the advice I might have for homophobic straight men and giving it to myself. (e.g. &#8220;Just because they&#8217;re attracted to people of your sex doesn&#8217;t mean you have to have sex with them.&#8221;)</p>
<p>I know he&#8217;s a just fictional character, but so are Will and Grace and plenty of homophobes manage to get as nauseated by Jack and Will as you seem to be by Lisa.</p>
<p>InJoy,</p>
<p>G</p>
<p>&#8220;Love is never wrong.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;All you need to know is Ms. Ellen is a lesbian and that means she only likes other lesbians.&#8221; &#8212; Chef, South Park</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://michellejones.net/onapath/2004/02/the-l-word-week-4.php/comment-page-1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 21:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellejones.net/onapath/?p=7#comment-25</guid>
		<description>It may be their point that gender is just a contrsuc but it&#039;s definitely not mine. I don&#039;t buy into that theory myself. Neither my gender nor my sexuality is &quot;fluid&quot; (how I hate that term) and I really get irritated with the insistence that it is.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be their point that gender is just a contrsuc but it&#8217;s definitely not mine. I don&#8217;t buy into that theory myself. Neither my gender nor my sexuality is &#8220;fluid&#8221; (how I hate that term) and I really get irritated with the insistence that it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tboo</title>
		<link>http://michellejones.net/onapath/2004/02/the-l-word-week-4.php/comment-page-1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>tboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 21:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellejones.net/onapath/?p=7#comment-24</guid>
		<description>ok; so brian krakow aka lisa is a little over the top i agree.  but lets take a step back for a moment....  what happened to respect for the transgendered?  isn&#039;t the whole point that gender is just a construction?  if lesbian identified man is too stupid too say, then what is a more appropriate term?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok; so brian krakow aka lisa is a little over the top i agree.  but lets take a step back for a moment&#8230;.  what happened to respect for the transgendered?  isn&#8217;t the whole point that gender is just a construction?  if lesbian identified man is too stupid too say, then what is a more appropriate term?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domgma04</title>
		<link>http://michellejones.net/onapath/2004/02/the-l-word-week-4.php/comment-page-1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Domgma04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellejones.net/onapath/?p=7#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Great site! I, like the other writer, searched the web to find a kindred soul who is confused and disturbed by this show.  I&#039;m a dyke with Tivo, thank god, so I can fast forward through the muck to the rare scenes worth watching.  If gay girls are writing this thing - how come the love scenes usually look so WRONG -- like the gals are playing Twister?  It&#039;s so odd.  Wait till you see the upcoming episode where Tennis Ball gets it on with the whiney writer chick.  I felt so sorry for the actors that had to perform this horribly written and directed scene.  Stay tuned...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site! I, like the other writer, searched the web to find a kindred soul who is confused and disturbed by this show.  I&#8217;m a dyke with Tivo, thank god, so I can fast forward through the muck to the rare scenes worth watching.  If gay girls are writing this thing &#8211; how come the love scenes usually look so WRONG &#8212; like the gals are playing Twister?  It&#8217;s so odd.  Wait till you see the upcoming episode where Tennis Ball gets it on with the whiney writer chick.  I felt so sorry for the actors that had to perform this horribly written and directed scene.  Stay tuned&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://michellejones.net/onapath/2004/02/the-l-word-week-4.php/comment-page-1#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 22:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellejones.net/onapath/?p=7#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I am having a serious problem with the lesbian-identified man.  I really don&#039;t want to be critical of the women writing for this show. I can imagine that they are having a hard time conveying everything that we would like to see in a show about us. This is, after all the first show of its kind.....but this Lisa guy bothers me.
He really bothers me. The thing I am most upset about is the fact that after the bi girl and he had sex, he ran away.  It just reminds me of the many times that I have heard girls say that males get what they want and run.  That really makes me uneasy....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am having a serious problem with the lesbian-identified man.  I really don&#8217;t want to be critical of the women writing for this show. I can imagine that they are having a hard time conveying everything that we would like to see in a show about us. This is, after all the first show of its kind&#8230;..but this Lisa guy bothers me.<br />
He really bothers me. The thing I am most upset about is the fact that after the bi girl and he had sex, he ran away.  It just reminds me of the many times that I have heard girls say that males get what they want and run.  That really makes me uneasy&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://michellejones.net/onapath/2004/02/the-l-word-week-4.php/comment-page-1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 21:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellejones.net/onapath/?p=7#comment-21</guid>
		<description>After watching this episode, I finally found the time to look on the internet for the definition of a &quot;lesbian-identified-man&quot; - 1 word - HOW ?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After watching this episode, I finally found the time to look on the internet for the definition of a &#8220;lesbian-identified-man&#8221; &#8211; 1 word &#8211; HOW ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snarkfest Dot Com</title>
		<link>http://michellejones.net/onapath/2004/02/the-l-word-week-4.php/comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Snarkfest Dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellejones.net/onapath/?p=7#comment-29</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The L Word, week 5&lt;/strong&gt;

For all you non-cable having folks, skits has reminded me that it&#039;s really unfair of us cable having people to deprive you of cable show snark. So allow me to present much snark about Showtime&#039;s new lesbian themed drama The...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The L Word, week 5</strong></p>
<p>For all you non-cable having folks, skits has reminded me that it&#8217;s really unfair of us cable having people to deprive you of cable show snark. So allow me to present much snark about Showtime&#8217;s new lesbian themed drama The&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Dangerous</title>
		<link>http://michellejones.net/onapath/2004/02/the-l-word-week-4.php/comment-page-1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Dangerous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellejones.net/onapath/?p=7#comment-20</guid>
		<description>&quot;Only she isn&#039;t there because, wait for it, she&#039;s off bumping and grinding (literally no less) with PL. Classy.&quot;
Classy indeed. Hey, that&#039;s my word!
This excerpt was what drove me to Google to find an opinion that agreed with my own... which is &quot;what the FUCK?!?&quot;
George W. may be a total asshole, but we&#039;re never going to make any real progress with sensationalist bullshit like this stirring the ire of the public. I mean, COME ON, if this show is the first to formally introduce lesbians... why jump RIGHT INTO the dark side with predatory sexuality and capitalizing upon men&#039;s Big Fear that every woman is really gay and will cheat on them, gleefully, given any opportunity and a spare bathroom. Or worse, that getting it on isn&#039;t cheating as long as it&#039;s with a person with identical naughty parts.
Uh huh. Leave it to television to sell that oh-so-enlightened message. I&#039;d like to see the public reaction when Ken leaves Barbie during a manicure to get it on with Seth in the makeup room.
I don&#039;t get Showtime, so I&#039;ll have to rely upon you for more keen updates. I&#039;ll stay tuned... and thanks. I like the entries I&#039;ve seen thus far! :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Only she isn&#8217;t there because, wait for it, she&#8217;s off bumping and grinding (literally no less) with PL. Classy.&#8221;<br />
Classy indeed. Hey, that&#8217;s my word!<br />
This excerpt was what drove me to Google to find an opinion that agreed with my own&#8230; which is &#8220;what the FUCK?!?&#8221;<br />
George W. may be a total asshole, but we&#8217;re never going to make any real progress with sensationalist bullshit like this stirring the ire of the public. I mean, COME ON, if this show is the first to formally introduce lesbians&#8230; why jump RIGHT INTO the dark side with predatory sexuality and capitalizing upon men&#8217;s Big Fear that every woman is really gay and will cheat on them, gleefully, given any opportunity and a spare bathroom. Or worse, that getting it on isn&#8217;t cheating as long as it&#8217;s with a person with identical naughty parts.<br />
Uh huh. Leave it to television to sell that oh-so-enlightened message. I&#8217;d like to see the public reaction when Ken leaves Barbie during a manicure to get it on with Seth in the makeup room.<br />
I don&#8217;t get Showtime, so I&#8217;ll have to rely upon you for more keen updates. I&#8217;ll stay tuned&#8230; and thanks. I like the entries I&#8217;ve seen thus far! <img src='http://michellejones.net/onapath/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
